IHP 525 Biostatistics at SNHU: Complete Guide for Health Professionals

IHP 525 (Biostatistics) serves as a required quantitative methods course for graduate health programs at Southern New Hampshire University, including Master of Public Health (MPH), Master of Science in Nursing (MSN), and Healthcare Administration programs. The course’s difficulty stems from requiring dual expertise rarely possessed simultaneously—statistical methodology competency (hypothesis testing, regression, probability) and health research interpretation ability (understanding clinical study designs, population health metrics, epidemiological concepts). Most students enter IHP 525 as practicing nurses, public health workers, or healthcare administrators with strong clinical knowledge but limited quantitative backgrounds, creating immediate struggles with statistical concepts, StatCrunch software navigation, and research methodology evaluation.

This comprehensive guide explains what makes IHP 525 uniquely challenging for health professionals, how the three milestone assignments progressively increase in statistical complexity, which specific biostatistics concepts create predictable confusion, why the article review project demands skills students don’t typically possess, and when professional course assistance becomes the most practical solution for maintaining GPA while managing clinical work, family responsibilities, and other graduate coursework.

Understanding IHP 525 at SNHU

IHP 525 occupies a critical position in SNHU’s health-focused graduate programs, serving as the quantitative methods foundation for evidence-based practice and research literacy.

Course Positioning in Graduate Programs

IHP 525 typically appears early in graduate health programs:

• MPH programs: Usually first or second term, establishes quantitative literacy for epidemiology and program evaluation courses
• MSN programs: Provides statistical foundation for evidence-based nursing practice and DNP project preparation
• Healthcare Administration: Builds analytical skills for healthcare data analysis and quality improvement
• Prerequisite relationships: Leads to advanced research methods, epidemiology, program evaluation courses

The early positioning creates problems—students with years since undergraduate statistics (or who never took statistics) face graduate-level biostatistics with minimal mathematical refresher.

Learning Objectives and Competencies

SNHU structures IHP 525 around these core competencies:

Statistical Methodology

• Descriptive statistics for health data (measures of central tendency and variability)
• Probability theory and distributions relevant to health outcomes
• Hypothesis testing procedures (z-tests, t-tests, chi-square, ANOVA)
• Confidence interval construction and interpretation
• Correlation and regression analysis for health relationships

Health Research Application

• Interpreting statistical results in peer-reviewed health literature
• Evaluating study designs and sampling methods
• Understanding bias, confounding, and threats to validity
• Translating statistical findings into clinical or public health implications
• Recognizing appropriate vs. inappropriate statistical methodology use

Software and Communication

• StatCrunch proficiency for data analysis and visualization
• APA 7th edition formatting for statistical reporting
• Clear communication of quantitative findings to non-technical audiences

Assessment Structure

IHP 525 evaluates students through multiple assignment types:

• Three milestone assignments: Progressive building blocks toward final project
• Final article review project: Comprehensive evaluation of peer-reviewed health research
• Weekly discussions: Application of statistical concepts to health scenarios
• Short-answer activities: Conceptual understanding checks
• Quizzes: Terminology and methodology comprehension assessments

The milestone structure means poor early performance compounds—weak Milestone 1 foundation undermines Milestone 2 success, which damages Milestone 3 quality, ultimately sabotaging the final project.

↑ Back to Top

Why Biostatistics Is Uniquely Hard for Health Professionals

Health professionals face specific challenges in biostatistics that differ from general statistics students.

The Clinical vs. Statistical Thinking Divide

Clinical training emphasizes different cognitive approaches than statistical reasoning:

Clinical Thinking Patterns

• Individual focus: Patient-centered care prioritizes individual presentation and response
• Deterministic decisions: Clinical decisions aim for definitive diagnoses and treatments
• Immediate application: Knowledge directly translates to patient care actions
• Certainty preference: Healthcare training emphasizes confidence in decision-making

Statistical Thinking Requirements

• Population focus: Statistics analyze group-level patterns, not individual cases
• Probabilistic reasoning: Accept uncertainty and quantify likelihood rather than seeking certainty
• Abstract application: Statistical concepts apply indirectly to practice through research evaluation
• Uncertainty acceptance: Statistics embrace confidence intervals and p-values representing probabilistic conclusions

The cognitive shift from “this patient needs this treatment” to “populations show these probabilistic patterns” requires mental flexibility many health professionals struggle to develop.

The Mathematics Background Gap

Health profession prerequisites typically don’t include substantial quantitative preparation:

Typical Health Professional Math Background

• Nursing: Dosage calculation, basic algebra—minimal statistics exposure
• Public health: Varies widely; some programs require statistics, others don’t
• Healthcare administration: Often business-focused with financial math, not statistical methods
• Time elapsed: Many graduate students completed undergraduate degrees 5-15 years prior

What IHP 525 Assumes

• Comfort with algebraic manipulation and formula application
• Understanding of basic probability concepts
• Familiarity with statistical terminology (variance, standard deviation, distribution)
• Experience interpreting quantitative research in academic literature

The gap between actual preparation and course expectations creates immediate overwhelm where students don’t know what they don’t know.

The Dual-Language Barrier

Biostatistics requires fluency in two specialized languages simultaneously:

Statistical Language

• Technical terms: null hypothesis, Type I error, confidence interval, regression coefficient
• Mathematical notation: Greek symbols (μ, σ, α, β), subscripts, summation notation
• Conceptual abstractions: populations, samples, distributions, parameters

Health Research Language

• Study designs: randomized controlled trial, case-control, cohort, cross-sectional
• Outcome measures: incidence, prevalence, relative risk, odds ratio, hazard ratio
• Validity concepts: internal validity, external validity, selection bias, information bias

Students must simultaneously learn statistical methodology while acquiring health research terminology, creating cognitive overload where neither language receives adequate processing attention.

↑ Back to Top

The Three Milestones: Progressive Complexity Explained

IHP 525’s three milestone assignments build progressively, each adding statistical complexity while maintaining health research context.

Milestone One: Descriptive Statistics and Data Exploration

What It Requires

Milestone One focuses on describing health datasets using summary statistics and visualizations:

• Dataset provided: SNHU supplies health-related data (often disease rates, patient characteristics, or health behaviors)
• Measures of central tendency: Calculate mean, median, mode for variables
• Measures of variability: Compute range, variance, standard deviation
• Data visualization: Create histograms, box plots, or bar charts in StatCrunch
• Written interpretation: Explain what statistics reveal about health phenomenon
• APA formatting: Present tables and figures following APA 7th edition standards

Common Failure Points

• Confusing mean vs. median appropriateness for skewed health data
• Calculating standard deviation manually instead of using StatCrunch correctly
• Creating visualizations that don’t follow APA figure formatting
• Describing statistics without interpreting health implications
• Misunderstanding when to use frequency tables vs. summary statistics

Why Students Struggle

Milestone One appears straightforward—”just calculate averages”—but requires understanding which statistics appropriately describe different variable types, how to interpret variability in health contexts (high standard deviation in blood pressure readings has clinical meaning), and translating numbers into health-relevant narratives.

Milestone Two: Probability and Inferential Statistics Introduction

What It Requires

Milestone Two introduces probability distributions and initial hypothesis testing:

• Probability calculations: Use normal distribution to find probabilities for health outcomes
• Z-score interpretation: Standardize health measurements and interpret deviations
• Confidence intervals: Construct and interpret CIs for population parameters
• Hypothesis testing introduction: Basic one-sample or two-sample tests
• Statistical vs. clinical significance: Distinguish statistical findings from practical importance
• Written analysis: Connect statistical results to public health or clinical implications

Common Failure Points

• Misinterpreting confidence intervals (thinking 95% CI means 95% probability parameter is in range)
• Confusing z-scores with raw scores or percentiles
• Not recognizing when normal distribution assumptions are violated
• Writing statistical significance (p < 0.05) without discussing clinical importance
• StatCrunch output interpretation errors—using wrong values from output tables

Why Students Struggle

Milestone Two demands probabilistic thinking foreign to clinical training. Understanding that “95% confident the true population mean falls between X and Y” requires accepting uncertainty and interpreting ranges rather than point estimates. Additionally, distinguishing statistical significance from clinical relevance requires judgment clinical training doesn’t necessarily develop.

Milestone Three: Hypothesis Testing and Comparative Analysis

What It Requires

Milestone Three involves comparing groups or testing relationships using inferential statistics:

• Test selection: Choose appropriate test (t-test, chi-square, ANOVA) based on research question and variable types
• Assumption checking: Verify data meet statistical test requirements
• StatCrunch execution: Run analyses and extract relevant results from output
• Results interpretation: Explain p-values, effect sizes, and practical implications
• Health context integration: Translate statistical findings into public health or clinical recommendations
• Limitations discussion: Identify study design constraints and generalizability issues

Common Failure Points

• Choosing wrong statistical test (using t-test when chi-square needed for categorical data)
• Misinterpreting p-values (thinking p = 0.03 means 3% chance null hypothesis is true)
• Ignoring assumption violations that invalidate results
• Reporting statistical outputs without explaining what they mean for health practice
• Not discussing Type I and Type II error implications in health contexts
• Confusing correlation with causation in observational health data

Why Students Struggle

Milestone Three requires synthesis—selecting appropriate methodology, executing correctly, and interpreting within health frameworks. Students who memorized procedures without understanding conceptual foundations struggle when faced with decision-making about which test applies. The health context adds complexity: statistical significance in disease outcome studies carries different weight than in behavioral intervention studies.

↑ Back to Top

Key Statistical Concepts Students Struggle With

Certain biostatistics concepts create predictable confusion across IHP 525 students regardless of health profession background.

P-Values in Health Research Context

The Correct Understanding

A p-value represents the probability of observing data as extreme as obtained if the null hypothesis (no effect/no difference) were true. If p = 0.03, there’s 3% probability random chance alone would produce observed results assuming no real health effect exists.

Common Misinterpretations

• Wrong: “p = 0.03 means there’s 3% chance the null hypothesis is true”
• Wrong: “p = 0.03 means our intervention has 97% probability of working”
• Wrong: “p = 0.03 means the health effect is important/large”
• Wrong: “p = 0.06 means there’s no effect” (arbitrary 0.05 threshold thinking)

Why It Matters for IHP 525

Health research heavily emphasizes p-values for intervention effectiveness and risk factor identification. Misinterpreting p-values leads to incorrect conclusions about treatment efficacy, disease causation, and public health policy recommendations. Milestone assignments and article reviews lose substantial points for p-value misconceptions even when calculations are correct.

Confidence Intervals for Population Health Parameters

The Concept

A 95% confidence interval provides a range of plausible values for population parameters based on sample data. The “95% confident” means the procedure used (not the specific interval) captures the true parameter 95% of times applied to different samples.

Common Confusions

• Thinking 95% CI means “95% probability the true value is in this range” (frequentist vs. Bayesian interpretation)
• Not recognizing that narrower CIs indicate more precise estimates
• Confusing confidence level (95%) with confidence interval width
• Failing to report CIs when describing health outcomes (reporting only point estimates)

Health Research Application

Confidence intervals communicate both effect size and precision—critical for health decision-making. A treatment reducing blood pressure by 5 mmHg (95% CI: 2-8 mmHg) differs meaningfully from reduction of 5 mmHg (95% CI: 0.1-9.9 mmHg) despite same point estimate. The wider CI indicates less certainty about true effect size.

Type I and Type II Errors in Medical Context

The Definitions

• Type I error (α): Rejecting true null hypothesis—concluding effect exists when it doesn’t (false positive)
• Type II error (β): Failing to reject false null hypothesis—missing real effect (false negative)

Health Research Stakes

Error types carry different consequences in health contexts:

• Drug approval (Type I error): Approving ineffective treatment wastes resources, exposes patients to side effects without benefit
• Drug approval (Type II error): Rejecting effective treatment denies patients beneficial intervention
• Disease screening (Type I error): False positive causes unnecessary anxiety, invasive follow-up procedures
• Disease screening (Type II error): False negative delays treatment, potentially worsening prognosis

Why Students Struggle

Students memorize definitions but don’t grasp practical implications for health research design and interpretation. Understanding why researchers set α = 0.05 (accepting 5% Type I error risk) versus stricter α = 0.01 requires appreciating trade-offs between error types in specific health contexts.

Regression Analysis for Health Outcomes

Basic Concept

Regression analysis models relationships between variables—predicting health outcomes (disease risk, treatment response) from predictor variables (age, BMI, smoking status, etc.).

Student Confusion Points

• Correlation vs. causation: Regression coefficients show associations, not necessarily causal relationships
• Coefficient interpretation: Understanding what “β = 1.5” means in context (unit increase in predictor associates with 1.5 unit increase in outcome)
• Multiple regression complexity: When models include multiple predictors, interpreting “controlling for other variables”
• Logistic regression peculiarities: Odds ratios vs. risk ratios, log-odds interpretation

Article Review Relevance

Many peer-reviewed health studies use regression analysis. Students must evaluate whether researchers appropriately controlled for confounders, correctly interpreted coefficients, and didn’t overstate causal claims from observational data.

↑ Back to Top

StatCrunch Platform Challenges for Health Professionals

StatCrunch serves as IHP 525’s primary statistical software, creating platform-specific learning curves beyond statistical concepts.

Interface Navigation for Non-Technical Users

Health professionals typically lack extensive software experience beyond electronic health records:

Common Navigation Struggles

• Data entry confusion: Understanding row/column structure, variable naming conventions
• Menu location uncertainty: Finding correct analysis under Stat > [category] menus
• Option selection overwhelm: Choosing appropriate settings when dialog boxes offer multiple checkboxes
• Output interpretation: Determining which numbers in output tables answer assignment questions

Output Interpretation Challenges

StatCrunch generates comprehensive output tables—students must extract relevant information:

What Students Miss

• Hypothesis test output: Distinguishing test statistic from p-value from confidence interval in results
• Regression tables: Finding coefficients, standard errors, p-values in multi-row output
• ANOVA tables: Understanding F-statistic, between-groups vs. within-groups rows
• Graph customization: StatCrunch defaults don’t match APA formatting requirements

APA-Compliant Output Formatting

StatCrunch produces output requiring substantial reformatting for APA standards:

Required Modifications

• Convert StatCrunch tables to proper APA table format with correct horizontal lines
• Reformat figures with APA-compliant titles, axis labels, legends
• Report statistics in APA narrative format: t(df) = value, p = value
• Include only relevant output portions, not entire StatCrunch printouts

Students who successfully run analyses still lose points if they paste raw StatCrunch output into papers without proper APA formatting.

Data Import and Management

IHP 525 sometimes requires working with provided datasets:

Technical Hurdles

• Downloading datasets from Canvas and importing to StatCrunch
• Understanding file format compatibility (Excel, CSV, text files)
• Cleaning data (handling missing values, recoding variables)
• Creating new variables through transformations or recoding

Students with limited spreadsheet experience struggle with data management tasks statistics courses assume as background knowledge.

↑ Back to Top

The Article Review Project: Comprehensive Research Evaluation

IHP 525’s final project requires evaluating peer-reviewed health research—a task demanding skills most students don’t possess.

Article Selection Challenge

Students must choose appropriate peer-reviewed studies meeting specific criteria:

Required Characteristics

• Quantitative methodology: Must employ statistical analysis (not qualitative research)
• Health relevance: Addresses public health, clinical, or healthcare administration topic
• Recent publication: Typically within 5 years
• Sufficient complexity: Provides enough methodological depth for comprehensive evaluation
• Appropriate scope: Not so complex students can’t understand methodology

Common Selection Errors

• Choosing qualitative studies or literature reviews without original data analysis
• Selecting overly complex studies using advanced statistics beyond IHP 525 scope (multilevel modeling, structural equation modeling)
• Picking studies with minimal statistical content insufficient for detailed critique
• Not verifying article is peer-reviewed (accepting blog posts, news articles, non-peer-reviewed publications)

Methodological Evaluation Requirements

The review demands systematic evaluation of research components:

What Students Must Assess

• Study design appropriateness: Does design answer research question validly?
• Sampling methodology: Is sample representative? Are there selection biases?
• Statistical methods selection: Are chosen analyses appropriate for data types and research questions?
• Assumption verification: Did researchers check whether data meet statistical test assumptions?
• Results interpretation: Do authors correctly interpret statistical findings?
• Limitations acknowledgment: Do researchers recognize study constraints?
• Generalizability claims: Are conclusions appropriately limited to study population?

Why This Is Difficult

Evaluating methodology requires understanding not just what researchers did, but whether alternatives would be better, whether assumptions were met, and whether conclusions follow from results. Students who barely grasp statistical concepts themselves cannot critique expert researchers’ methodological choices.

Statistical Interpretation Critique

Students must evaluate whether authors appropriately interpreted statistical results:

Common Author Errors to Identify

• Overstating causation from correlational data
• Confusing statistical with clinical significance
• Misinterpreting p-values or confidence intervals
• Ignoring multiple comparison problems when conducting many tests
• Not discussing effect sizes, only p-values
• Generalizing beyond study sample inappropriately

Recognizing these errors requires statistical literacy exceeding mere calculation ability—students must judge whether interpretations align with statistical evidence.

APA Writing and Organization

The article review must follow formal academic writing standards:

Required Sections

• Introduction: Article context and review purpose
• Study summary: Research question, design, methodology overview
• Methodological evaluation: Critique of design, sampling, and analysis choices
• Statistical interpretation assessment: Evaluation of results interpretation
• Limitations and implications: Study constraints and practice/research implications
• Conclusion: Overall assessment and recommendations

APA Formatting Demands

• Proper headings hierarchy
• In-text citations for article being reviewed and supporting literature
• Reference list in APA 7th edition format
• Professional academic tone throughout
• Statistical notation following APA standards

Students who write clinically (patient notes, care plans) struggle translating to academic prose with formal structure and citation requirements.

↑ Back to Top

SNHU’s Graduate 8-Week Format: Accelerated Timeline Challenges

SNHU’s compressed graduate term structure creates unique pressures for working health professionals.

Workload Compression

Graduate biostatistics compressed into 8 weeks demands intense weekly time investment:

Traditional vs. Accelerated Comparison

• Traditional semester: 15-16 weeks; 6-9 hours weekly for 3-credit graduate course
• 8-week term: Half the time; 12-18 hours weekly to cover same content
• IHP 525 reality: Students report 15-25 hours weekly due to statistical complexity and unfamiliarity

Working Professional Context

Most IHP 525 students are employed health professionals:

Typical Student Profile

• Full-time clinical work: Nurses working 12-hour shifts, often with irregular schedules
• Public health practitioners: 40+ hour weeks in community health, epidemiology, or program management
• Healthcare administrators: Management responsibilities with unpredictable time demands
• Family responsibilities: Many students balancing coursework with parenting or eldercare

The Time Equation Problem

Working 40 hours + IHP 525 (20 hours) + other courses (15 hours) + family = unsustainable demands with zero buffer for unexpected work issues, family emergencies, or illness.

The Cumulative Knowledge Problem

Biostatistics builds sequentially—each topic depends on previous mastery:

The Cascade Effect

• Weeks 1-2: Struggle with descriptive statistics → weak foundation
• Weeks 3-4: Probability requires understanding variability → compounded confusion
• Weeks 5-6: Hypothesis testing builds on probability → complete overwhelm
• Weeks 7-8: Article review demands synthesis of all concepts → catastrophic failure

Traditional semesters allow recovery from early struggles. In 8-week format, early confusion cascades into course failure before recovery becomes possible. By Week 6 when students realize they’re failing, insufficient time remains to develop genuine statistical competency.

↑ Back to Top

Top 7 IHP 525 Mistakes That Destroy Grades

Certain errors appear consistently across IHP 525 students regardless of health profession background:

1. Misinterpreting P-Values

The Mistake: Writing “p = 0.03 means there’s 3% chance the intervention doesn’t work”

Why It Happens: Intuitive interpretation treats p-values as hypothesis probabilities rather than data probabilities given hypotheses.

Correct Understanding: “If the intervention truly had no effect, there’s 3% probability we’d observe data this extreme by random chance alone.”

Grade Impact: Rubrics explicitly penalize p-value misconceptions. Milestone assignments and article reviews lose 15-20% of points for incorrect p-value interpretation even when calculations are correct.

2. Confusing Statistical with Clinical Significance

The Mistake: Concluding that p < 0.05 automatically means health intervention is important/useful

Example: Study shows weight loss intervention produces statistically significant 0.5 pound average reduction (p = 0.001). Student concludes intervention is clinically valuable without discussing whether 0.5 pounds matters for health outcomes.

Why It Happens: Students fixate on p-value threshold without considering effect size and practical importance.

Grade Impact: Health research evaluation requires discussing clinical relevance. Reports focusing solely on statistical significance without practical implications earn C-level grades maximum.

3. Choosing Wrong Statistical Test

The Mistake: Using t-test when chi-square needed, or correlation when regression appropriate

Example: Analyzing relationship between categorical smoking status (yes/no) and categorical disease outcome (present/absent) using t-test instead of chi-square

Why It Happens: Students memorize procedures without understanding variable types (categorical vs. continuous) dictate appropriate analyses.

Grade Impact: Wrong test choice typically earns zero credit on entire Milestone 3 analysis regardless of correct execution of wrong test.

4. Reporting Raw StatCrunch Output Without APA Formatting

The Mistake: Copy-pasting StatCrunch tables and figures directly into papers

Why It Happens: Students focus on running analyses correctly, not recognizing output requires reformatting for APA standards.

Grade Impact: Rubrics include specific APA formatting criteria. Each improperly formatted table/figure loses points; cumulative formatting errors reduce grades by 20-30%.

5. Selecting Inappropriate Article for Review

The Mistake: Choosing qualitative study, literature review, or overly complex quantitative research

Why It Happens: Students don’t understand quantitative vs. qualitative distinction, or overestimate their ability to critique advanced statistical methods.

Grade Impact: Wrong article selection often discovered after substantial work investment, requiring restart with time pressure. Some students submit reviews of inappropriate articles earning automatic failure.

6. Not Discussing Study Limitations

The Mistake: Summarizing study methods and results without critically evaluating limitations

Why It Happens: Clinical training emphasizes applying evidence, not critiquing research methodology. Students don’t naturally think about sampling bias, confounders, or generalizability constraints.

Grade Impact: Article review rubrics heavily weight critical evaluation. Summaries without substantive critique earn D/F grades regardless of accurate summarization.

7. Ignoring Health Context in Statistical Interpretation

The Mistake: Reporting statistical results without explaining health/clinical/public health implications

Example: “Analysis showed r = 0.65, p < 0.001" without explaining what this correlation means for health practice or policy

Why It Happens: Students focus on completing statistical procedures, treating health context as secondary to calculations.

Grade Impact: IHP 525 emphasizes biostatistics application to health. Statistical reporting without health interpretation loses 25-35% of assignment points.

↑ Back to Top

How Expert IHP 525 Assistance Works

At Finish My Math Class, we provide comprehensive IHP 525 support understanding both biostatistics methodology and health research context.

Our IHP 525 Expertise

• Biostatistics competency: Advanced understanding of statistical methods used in health research
• Health research literacy: Familiarity with public health and clinical study designs, outcome measures, and interpretation frameworks
• StatCrunch proficiency: Complete platform mastery for data analysis and output interpretation
• APA 7th edition expertise: Proper formatting for statistical reporting in health research context
• Graduate writing ability: Academic prose appropriate for graduate-level health programs
• SNHU familiarity: Understanding of Canvas platform, rubric requirements, and timeline pressures

Service Options

Complete Course Management

Most IHP 525 students choose comprehensive support:

• All three milestone assignments (drafts and final submissions)
• Final article review project (selection through final paper)
• Weekly discussion posts with peer responses
• Short-answer activities and quizzes
• StatCrunch analyses with APA-formatted output
• Regular progress monitoring and grade tracking

Targeted Assignment Help

Some students prefer selective assistance:

• Single milestone completion
• Article review project only
• StatCrunch analysis and interpretation support
• APA formatting and editing services

Quality Assurance Process

1. Expert assignment: Biostatistics specialists matched to IHP 525 requirements
2. Rubric analysis: Careful review of SNHU grading rubrics for each assignment
3. Statistical accuracy: Double-checking all calculations and interpretations
4. Health context integration: Ensuring statistical results connect meaningfully to public health or clinical implications
5. APA compliance: Verification of formatting against APA 7th edition manual
6. Plagiarism prevention: Original writing passing Turnitin screening
7. Deadline management: Timely submissions within SNHU’s 8-week timeline

Who Benefits Most

Professional IHP 525 assistance makes particular sense for:

• Working nurses in MSN programs: Clinical shifts (12-hour, night, rotating) leave limited study time
• Public health practitioners: Full-time community health work while pursuing MPH
• Healthcare administrators: Management responsibilities with unpredictable demands
• Career changers with non-quantitative backgrounds: Entering health fields without prior statistics exposure
• International students: Strong clinical knowledge but struggling with academic English and APA formatting
• Parents and caregivers: Family responsibilities limiting available study hours
• Students with math anxiety: Previous negative statistics experiences creating psychological barriers

↑ Back to Top

↑ Back to Top